Solar Eclipse 2024

Did you miss the eclipse, or regret not making the pilgrimage to somewhere to see totality? Well, don't worry, there's another opportunity on April 8th, 2024. The lake area will probably be in the 70% of totality range, not quite as much as yesterday's, but a quick trip down to Southeast Missouri is all you need to get in the path of totality. I'm thinking of being on one of the many beautiful rivers such as the Current or Eleven Point for the next one. Poplar Bluff looks to be on the path of totality. Better make your reservations now!  Other major cities seem to be Austin Texas and Little Rock, Arkansas. These are both great cities and should be very festive.  I imagine rooms are already being booked.

The 2024 event will also be a total solar eclipse, with the major difference being where totality will peak, it's longest duration and sharpest contrast. This will occur in central Mexico in 2024, but Missouri should have a fine show again.

Happy Birthday to the U.S. Coast Guard!

The oldest military service of the United States turns 227 years old this month.  I've been a little harsh on the Coast Guard lately in regards to Lake of the Ozarks, so let me make some amends by saying Happy Birthday to what I consider the finest branch of the military this country has ever produced. Certainly not the most lethal, but that isn't their mission, which is why I was proud to have served. Saving lives, protecting our country, and ensuring free commerce along our waterways is just as important as projecting force abroad. Any damn fool can pull a trigger, but it takes something a bit more to put your ass on the line to save another.

U.S.C.G.C Eagle and escort. Did you know she was originally a Nazi ship? Yep. You can just make it out in the picture but on her prow remains the nautical figurehead of the Nazi Party Eagle, called Parteiadler ("Party's Eagle"), and where it once clutched a swastika, it now clings to the shield of the U.S. Coast Guard. The spoils of war.

From Alaska to Key West Florida, and on three separate ships, my four years were probably the most memorable years of my life. To the great men and women I served with, and those that serve today, a heartfelt salute.

Oh...
To the U.S. Navy.... Phhhht!
To the U.S. Army...... Phhhht!
To the U.S. Air Force.... Phhhht!

To the U.S. Marines.... You guys are great! Remember D-day!

All in good fun lads. You know we're all in this together.

Semper Paratus!

July 2017 Lake Levels and Flow Rates

A very typical July chart with start and ending levels almost exactly at the 5 year average with power generation coinciding nicely with temperature demands for energy.  I'm sure this helped keep levels at full pool despite the modest lack of rain. Boring, but I like boring when it comes to this data. It means things are predictable and orderly.

One more month of peak summer to go.  Enjoy!

Governor's Veto Keeps Boat Railing Laws In Place

On July 14th, Missouri Governor Eric Greitens vetoed Senate Bill 65 which would have exempted certain boats from railing requirements for passengers riding on specific areas when underway(moving), namely gunwales (the top edge of the sides of a boat), bow tops, sundecks and seats. The law would have exempted jet driven and older boats.

The Governor's veto means the current law, stated below, remains.

"306.126.  Motorboats, regulations as to passenger seating while under way — person in water, flag required, when — slow speed required, when — penalty. — 1.  The operator of a motorboat shall not allow any person to ride or sit on the gunwales, decking over the bow, railing, top of seat back or decking over the back of the motorboat while under way, unless such person is inboard of adequate guards or railing provided on the motorboat to prevent a passenger from being lost overboard.  As used in this section, the term "adequate guards railing" means guards or railings having a height parameter of at least six inches but not more than eighteen inches.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to mean that passengers or other persons aboard a motorboat cannot occupy the decking over the bow of the boat to moor it to a mooring buoy or to cast off from such a buoy, or for any other necessary purpose.  The provisions of this section shall not apply to vessels propelled by sail."

This will probably not come as welcome news to those who like idling around party cove, but this is after all about safety.  So what would SB65 have changed? The statute would have been replaced with the exact same language except for the last line which would have added some exceptions beyond sailboats.

"The provisions of this section shall not apply to vessels propelled by sail, outboard jet motors, or vessels not originally manufactured with adequate guards or railing."

In his veto letter the Governor cited "unintended consequences" of the change in the language since the statute would have included all Missouri state waterways and his concern was specifically how it would have affected boating on the Lake of the Ozarks. The bill was put forth by Missouri State Senator Dave Schatz from the 26th District which covers an area that includes the Meramec River. The Senator is also from Sullivan Missouri which is one of the last major towns people pass through on their way to the Current River.  River tourism is a good part of that areas income revenue. It's a safe assumption that what the Senator was trying to achieve was a change in the law to allow river runners more latitude regarding where people could sit while in smaller, slower, jet driven river boats. You won't see many river running jet boats with railing on them and people love riding on the bow down there (me too!). Whether another attempt is made to change the law with more specific language is unknown.

Coast Guard Confusion

“The Lake of the Ozarks is one of the most dangerous bodies of water in the United States according to Coast Guard boating statistics..."  - Captain Martin L. Malloy UMR Sector Commander, U.S.C.G as reported on LakeExpo.com June 20th, 2017

The article I'm referring to above showed up on LakeExpo.com on June 20th, breathlessly reported over the presence of the U.S. Coast Guard on the Lake of the Ozarks last weekend.  While I have no beef with LakeExpo in particular, I'm a little peeved at the contents of the article. Lake Expo has, as others have done in the past, promoted the idea that the U.S. Coast Guard has jurisdiction on the Lake of the Ozarks because it is considered a "navigable" waterway.

2018 UPDATE:  I've recently had a very nice conversation with the Public Affairs Office of the U.S.C.G regarding their jurisdiction on the Lake of the Ozarks. It would seem, my opinion is in error as far as they are officially concerned and that they indeed have complete authority on the lake as a law enforcement agency.  Which raises many questions. I'll be posting about this conversation and the reasoning behind their position regarding jurisdiction and authority soon and provide a link here.

The Lake of the Ozarks is NOT considered a "navigable" body of water. Although it meets the common sense notion of what a navigable body of water is (in fact it's extremely navigable!), the label "navigable" is assigned to waterways by the U.S. Congress under its commerce powers, and thus determines which federal agency has maritime authority over it. But I've discussed this all before while this line of crap continues to be used to justify the presence of the Coast Guard on the lake. The Coast Guard's enforcement authority is very limited here.  This is why there's usually a Missouri State Water Patrol boat right along side of them to do any real law enforcement. The MSWP is THE primary law enforcement authority on the Lake of the Ozarks. The Coast Guard doesn't show up periodically just to make sure they're doing a swell job enforcing laws.

But the real reason for this particular rant is what the commander of the Upper Mississippi River Sector was quoted saying about the Lake of the Ozarks, “The Lake of the Ozarks is one of the most dangerous bodies of water in the United States according to Coast Guard boating statistics."

If Lake Expo has accurately quoted Captain Malloy, then he's not reading his own reports. Yeah, this guy.  I'm sure he's a nice guy and all, but he needs to read his own damn reports.

I assume Malloy is citing the annual Coast Guard Recreational Boating Statistics report as the source of his assessment, but this report has never supported such a dubious claim. Granted, the report is at the state level and does not single out specific waterways, but I've been analyzing this report and it's relation to Water Patrol reported accidents on the Lake of the Ozarks for many years now, going back to 2004. While stories abound of injury or even death in the media, there is no statistical evidence to indicate the lake is any more (or less for that matter) dangerous than any other body of water in Missouri. You can read my analysis with a link to the latest CG report for yourself here.  Maybe my analysis is wrong, some assumptions must be made, but there is nothing in the report that points here saying, "Yep, that's a fairly dangerous lake you got there!".

I'm a Coast Guard veteran, and proud to have served, so I have no ax to grind with the Coast Guard (okay maybe with officer types since I was enlisted) but this nonsense needs to stop. Captain Malloy's comment is inaccurate and possibly self aggrandizing. The popularity of the Lake of the Ozarks is only growing and that guarantees a lot of press when bad things do happen, but to get an official statement from the sector commander of the Coast Guard that it is one of the most dangerous lakes in the country is either willfully ignorant, or a thinly veiled attempt to promote Coast Guard presence in the area.  Let's be clear, the Coast Guard is not relevant on the Lake of the Ozarks except to promote safety, affirm proper vessel documentation (Coast Guard registered vessels only!), and help herd boats during firework displays and racing events.  Their resources are better spent on other waterways where their law enforcement authority has real teeth, rather than trying to look like the big dog pissing in the tall weeds in our backyard.

Memorial Weekend 2017 Finds the Lake Still in Cleanup Mode

Since the Summer of 2017 begins in earnest this weekend, I thought we might take a look at lake conditions beforehand and get a little early jump on this month's chart.

Believe it or not, lake level and flow rates are still under the influence of the torrential rains at the end of April.  Let's take a look at Truman Lake first to see why we are still where we are with flow rates.

Ten Year Graph of Truman Lake Levels

Truman Lake is controlled by the Corps of Engineers while Lake of the Ozarks is not, but there is a Memorandum of Agreement which says Ameren must coordinate operations with the CoE, especially during flood events.  As we can see above Truman Lake reached its highest level in the last 10 years at the end of April, while Lake of the Ozarks barely exceeded 661ft, and only briefly at that. Between the two lakes, Truman did its job protecting the Lake of the Ozarks from a *major* flood event that would have surpassed 2015s (both of them). But with the rains subsiding this month, Ameren has kept flow rates through Bagnell Dam well above average in an attempt to lower Truman Lake.  It's a very slow process and will likely continue through the first holiday weekend.  With that in mind, let's take a look at May's levels and flow rates.

May of course started with the lake at it highest levels for the year, and likely the highest for the entire year.  Discharge from Bagnell Dam remains above full turbine flow which means flood gates are still partially open sustaining nearly 50,000cfs.  For Memorial weekend, lake levels are just slightly below the 5 year average, but doable for those of us in shallow waters. As for all that water that's passed through Bagnell Dam? We'll examine just how much water in the regular end of the month report when the final data comes in.

For now just be advised that the lake is (relatively) murky and full of debris coming down from Truman.  Running your boat will be a little more risky this weekend as debris is everywhere.  As for night running, I will definitely be adopting a cocktail cruise speed.  On plane even at legal speed will be very risky to your outdrives.

Be safe. Have fun.

April 2017 Lake Levels and Flow Rates - over 4ft in 24 hours!

I try not to be critical of Ameren when it comes to their stewardship of the lake or how they treat lake home owners, after all they are an energy company whose only real interest in the Lake of the Ozarks is how much power they can generate and sell while fulfilling their regulatory compliance requirement for having a percentage of that energy produced by "renewable" energy sources.

But when Ameren manages the lake without any apparent consideration for ecology or property? It pisses me off.

Is that a harsh criticism? Does a lake level one foot above full pool really cause issues?  In a word, no. A lake level of 661 is not a "flooding" event at the Lake.  What is an event is rapid change. Take a look at the level and flow chart for April.  See anything striking? It's not the 661 lake level itself, but how fast it got there that is the problem.

The forecast for potential flooding rains was anticipated early in the last week of April and Ameren, as to be expected, began ramping up turbine flow on Wednesday April 26th, with full flow by Friday the 28th. But as the rains fell Ameren surely watched as lake levels began to rise at an alarming rate. This rate of change continued for nearly a day with full turbine flow (35Kcfs) having little impact on lake levels. At it's most dramatic, the lake rose one foot in just four hours on Saturday.

Ameren saw this rapid rise but did nothing until Sunday, April 30th at 6:00am. With the lake at 660.51 the flood gates were finally opened. Let's be clear here. It wasn't until the lake's level punched through 660ft (full pool) that flood gates were opened Sunday morning. This means that in just under 24 hours the Lake of the Ozarks was allowed to rise over 4 feet!

Note: My statement above, that flood gates were not opened until the lake reached 660.51 feet, is (indirectly) disputed by Warren Witt, the Director of Hydro Operations at Bagnell Dam who was quoted as saying they were opened when the lake reached 659.5 feet in a later interview with  Lake Expo. But I'm going off Ameren's own data so you be the judge (zoom in on the above chart). From the above chart the flow rate was still about 35,000cfs when the lake was at 659.5. But Witt should know of course when the gates were opened, and it is certainly reasonable that there is a delay from the time flood gates open until the change in flow rates registers with Ameren's own sensors. Flow rates measured independently by USGS seem to back up his statement that the gates were opened at 6am, so I'll have to give the benefit of the doubt here.

I'd have to check my own records, but I'm pretty sure the floods of 2015, both of them, didn't rise so quickly.  This rate of change is highly disruptive to the ecosystem and damaging to the very shoreline that Ameren makes us lake home owners all bend over backwards to protect.

I would not argue that there was anything that could have been done to prevent reaching the 661ft level given the pressures from Truman Lake and the Osage River, but I believe an earlier opening of the flood gates would have made the rate of change a little more bearable.  Management Grade? D